References and Additional Reading

In creating this Inbox Project collection, we have relied on a number of sources. While many of these sources are not freely available electronically, we are providing their citations below, both to acknowledge our reliance, and to point the reader to additional resources.

Arora, Vivek, The CAN-SPAM Act: An Inadequate Attempt to Deal with a Growing Problem, 39 Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems 299 (2006)

Bump, Cathy & Practicing Law Institute, Considerations in Drafting Privacy Policies, PLI Order No. 14617 (March-April 2008)

Cain, Rita Marie, When Does Preemption Not Really Preempt? The Role of State Law after CAN-SPAM, 3 I/S Journal of Law and Policy 751 (2007)

Corpus Juris Secundum, 16B § 812, Constitutional Law: Freedom of Speech and of the Press: Commercial Speech (In General) (2011)

Craig, John D.R., Invasion of Privacy and Charter Values: The Common-Law Tort Awakens, 42 McGill Law Journal 355 (1997)

Huh, Soon Chul, Invasion of Privacy v. Commercial Speech: Regulation of Spam with a Comparative Constitutional Point of View, 70 Albany Law Review 181 (2006)

Janger, Edward J. & Paul M. Schwartz, The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Information Privacy, and the Limits of Default Rules, 86 Minnesota Law Review 1219 (2002)

Lim, Susuk, Death of the Spam Wrangler: CAN-SPAM Private Plaintiffs Required to Show Actual Harm, 6 Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts 155 (2010)

McClennan, Jennifer & Vadim Schick, 'Oh, Privacy': Canada's Importance in the Development of the International Data Privacy Regime, 38 Georgetown Journal of International Law 669 (2007)

Mutchler, Ariella, Note: CAN-SPAM Versus the European Union E-Privacy Directive: Does Either Provide a Solution to the Problem of Spam, 43 Suffolk University Law Review 957 (2010)

Oriola, Taiwo A., Regulating Unsolicited Commercial Email in the United States and the European Union: Challenges and Prospects, 7 Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 113 (2005)

Raysman, Richard & Peter Brown, Limiting Private Actions Under the CAN-SPAM Act, 245 New York Law Journal 5 (February 8, 2011)

Reyero, Jay, The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: A False Hope, 11 SMU Science & Technology Law Review 195 (2007)

Rohlmeier, Jeff & Practicing Law Institute, Information Privacy in the Asia-Pacific Region and Canada: Recent Legislative, Regulatory, and Policy Developments, PLI Order No. 14648 (June-July 2008)

Scranton, David F., International Privacy Compliance for the Rest of Us, 118 Banking Law Journal 855 (2001)

Smolla, Rodney A., The "Do Not Call List Controversy: A Parable of Privacy and Speech, 38 Creighton Law Review 743 (2005)

Tallman, David A., Note: Financial Institutions and the Safe Harbor Agreement: Securing Cross-Border Financial Information Flows, 34 Law & Policy in International Business 747 (2003)

Thomson Reuters (West), 50 State Statutory Surveys: Utilities/Telecommunications: Anti-Spam Laws (August 2010)

Whitman, James Q., The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty, 113 Yale Law Journal 1151 (2004)